Interactive ToolDecision Tree4 min

Which Battle Card Do You Need Most Urgently?

A prioritization tool for battle card backlog. Score each competitor on threat level and recent sales requests. Output: the card to build next and why.

Who it’s for: PMMs and sales enablement leads ranking a battle-card backlog when the list is longer than the quarter.

Question 1 of 7
01

How often does this competitor show up in your active pipeline?

Answer for one specific competitor at a time — this wizard scores that competitor’s card priority, not the whole backlog.

How to read your result

Read it honestly, not charitably.

Three priority levels: urgent (now), soon (within 60 days), later (park and revisit). Run this wizard once per competitor. The output is a per-card verdict, not a full backlog ranking.

If you score three competitors as urgent, you have a capacity problem — the team cannot ship three high-quality cards in one quarter. Reduce to the top two and move the third to soon.

What to do next

Three moves you can make this week.

  1. Run this for every competitor you track. Put the results in one table. The ranking is the plan.
  2. Cap urgent at two cards per quarter. Anything more and quality collapses. If three land as urgent, force-rank.
  3. Set a calendar review for parked cards — 10 minutes each, next quarter. The system only works if parking is not permanent forgetting.
The thinking behind it

Why these questions, in this order.

Seven questions because battle-card priority is the product of seven factors: deal frequency, win rate, sales demand, deal size, positioning overlap, competitor momentum, and current card state. A competitor strong on two of these is soon; one strong on four or more is urgent.

The scoring is deliberately threshold-based rather than linear. A “losing most deals” answer alone should push a card to urgent, even if everything else is quiet — because the hemorrhage is already happening.